Dangerously fat kids could be taken from their parents and put into care, council chiefs declared yesterday. Read the entire article.
I posted below that Britain faces a nation wide crisis over widening obesity rates. Now we see local councils advocating that the State take control of "dangerously" obese children and remove them from their families.
__________________________________________________
This from the Sun:
They warned that the worst cases of obesity will be increasingly seen as evidence of "parental neglect."
Social workers will have to step in to offer advice to protect the child's welfare.
In the most extreme cases, children could even be taken away from parents.
. . . The dramatic warning was delivered by the Local Government Association, which represents more than 400 councils in England and Wales.
Around one in four people in England are obese, so overweight that it threatens their health.
But experts fear HALF the population will be affected by 2032.
LGA public health spokesman David Rogers said some councils were already taking actions "where parents are putting children's health in real danger.
"Councils would step in to deal with an under-nourished and neglected child so should a case with a morbidly obese child be different?
. . . "There needs to be a national debate about the extent to which it is acceptable for local authorities to take action in cases where the welfare of children is in real jeopardy."
. . . But Mr Rogers said childhood obesity had now become an issue for every council.
Tough action was needed to protect the health of millions of children. . . .
Of all the ways that this problem can be addressed, taking a child from his family seems the absolute worst possible decision. Whether a child grows up fat or slim may be a concern of the state, but it is so patently obvious that there is so much more involved in the family unit that bears on what the child will grow into as to make this draconian policy proposal utterly insane. And even besides that, there are a thousand things the state can do to promote health and weight loss, not the least of which is mandating more physical activities for school age children. It is one thing to use the bully pulpit, another thing entirely to use the police powers of the state against a family.
But, sad to say, I am not surprised that this suggestion should arise in the U.K. As a general rule, the socialist left believes in the superiority of centralized power and that those in power - so long as they are reliably socialist - are in a better position to make decisions effecting individuals than individuals can make for themselves. Socialists also tend to have far less respect for the traditional family unit - as the U.K.'s welfare system among others makes clear. Modern Britain is a true laboratory experiement in socialism and multiculturalism transposed on top of a Western democracy.
Cross posted at Wolf Howling.
Friday, August 15, 2008
Nanny State In Action
Obesity In Britain An Expanding Health Crisis
Obesity poses as grave a threat to Britain and the NHS as terrorism, a Government adviser has warned. Read the entire article. I think that the government is making a tremendous mistake by focusing on what people eat rather than exercise and eating habits. A cursory glance at our activity levels and obesity rates over the past century suggests that exercise and activity levels are the fulcrum of weight loss.
Cornish Pasties are a thing to be savored, but apparently our cousins across the pond are savoring them in a bit too great a quanity. According to a public health expert quoted on the front page of the Daily Times, given current trends, over half of all people in Britain will be obese in 25 years.
______________________________________________________
This from the Daily Times:
Public health expert Professor David Hunter criticised ministers for failing to take 'bold action' to tackle the growing crisis.
Experts have already warned that if trends continue, half the population will be obese within 25 years, causing life expectancy to fall for the first time in two centuries.
Professor Hunter, of Durham University, said that since the 1970s governments have done little more than 'tinkered round the edges' of the emerging health crisis.
'They have been talking about it for four decades but that never seems to be enough,' he said.
'The Government was quick to move for things like ID cards or 42-day detention without trial - now it needs to show similar leadership in public health.
'The threat to our future health is just as significant as the current security threat.'
Although Government initiatives were having some impact, he added, these were on a 'piddling' scale.
'Lots of the initiatives are under a voluntary agreement - but it has just come to the point where things like these are simply not working,' Professor Hunter said.
Around 25 per cent of people in England are classified as obese - so overweight it threatens their health - compared to 8 per cent in 1980.
On current trends, half of the population will be clinically obese by 2032, and those with Type II diabetes - which is triggered almost exclusively by being overweight - will rise tenfold to 19million.
Overall, obesity is thought to knock nine years off lifespan. Various cancers, including breast, colon, kidney and stomach cancer, are known to be linked to weight.
The cost to the NHS of treating obesity - already £1billion a year - will also soar.
A spokesman for the Department of Health said: 'We are tackling obesity through awareness campaigns and action in schools.' . . .